loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 1024 loop0: detected capacity change from 1024 to 64 ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.0/5318 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880392728f8 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfsplus_block_allocate+0xa7/0xce0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:35 but task is already holding lock: ffff888011b147c8 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfsplus_file_extend+0x215/0x1d70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:453 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:614 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19f/0x1300 kernel/locking/mutex.c:776 hfsplus_get_block+0x39e/0x1670 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:260 block_read_full_folio+0x29f/0x830 fs/buffer.c:2417 filemap_read_folio+0x137/0x3b0 mm/filemap.c:2496 do_read_cache_folio+0x358/0x590 mm/filemap.c:4096 do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:4162 [inline] read_cache_page+0x5d/0x170 mm/filemap.c:4171 read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:1022 [inline] hfsplus_block_allocate+0xf3/0xce0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:37 hfsplus_file_extend+0xb2d/0x1d70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:464 hfsplus_get_block+0x42c/0x1670 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:245 __block_write_begin_int+0x6c6/0x1910 fs/buffer.c:2142 block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2253 [inline] cont_write_begin+0x737/0xae0 fs/buffer.c:2591 hfsplus_write_begin+0x66/0xb0 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:48 page_symlink+0x27a/0x440 fs/namei.c:6374 hfsplus_symlink+0xc9/0x290 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:481 vfs_symlink+0x195/0x340 fs/namei.c:5615 filename_symlinkat+0x1cd/0x410 fs/namei.c:5640 __do_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:5667 [inline] __se_sys_symlink+0x4d/0x2b0 fs/namei.c:5663 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x14d/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x15a5/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237 lock_acquire+0xf0/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:614 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19f/0x1300 kernel/locking/mutex.c:776 hfsplus_block_allocate+0xa7/0xce0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:35 hfsplus_file_extend+0xb2d/0x1d70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:464 hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x125/0x510 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:358 hfsplus_create_cat+0x1e2/0x11b0 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:272 hfsplus_mknod+0x16a/0x2b0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:532 vfs_create+0x2d1/0x460 fs/namei.c:4176 filename_mknodat+0x3e8/0x660 fs/namei.c:5142 __do_sys_mknod fs/namei.c:5179 [inline] __se_sys_mknod+0x3a/0x150 fs/namei.c:5176 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x14d/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock); lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex); lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock); lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by syz.0.0/5318: #0: ffff8880386ce420 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x41/0x90 fs/namespace.c:493 #1: ffff888011afb238 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:1073 [inline] #1: ffff888011afb238 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __start_dirop fs/namei.c:2923 [inline] #1: ffff888011afb238 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: start_dirop fs/namei.c:2934 [inline] #1: ffff888011afb238 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: filename_create+0x200/0x370 fs/namei.c:4922 #2: ffff888039272998 (&sbi->vh_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfsplus_mknod+0x7c/0x2b0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:524 #3: ffff8880126e40b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x168/0x2d0 fs/hfsplus/bfind.c:28 #4: ffff888011b147c8 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfsplus_file_extend+0x215/0x1d70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:453 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5318 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x2e1/0x300 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043 check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x15a5/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237 lock_acquire+0xf0/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:614 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19f/0x1300 kernel/locking/mutex.c:776 hfsplus_block_allocate+0xa7/0xce0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:35 hfsplus_file_extend+0xb2d/0x1d70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:464 hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x125/0x510 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:358 hfsplus_create_cat+0x1e2/0x11b0 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:272 hfsplus_mknod+0x16a/0x2b0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:532 vfs_create+0x2d1/0x460 fs/namei.c:4176 filename_mknodat+0x3e8/0x660 fs/namei.c:5142 __do_sys_mknod fs/namei.c:5179 [inline] __se_sys_mknod+0x3a/0x150 fs/namei.c:5176 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x14d/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7efc7939c799 Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007efc7a232fe8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000085 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007efc79615fa0 RCX: 00007efc7939c799 RDX: 0000000000000701 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 0000200000000500 RBP: 00007efc79432bd9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007efc79616038 R14: 00007efc79615fa0 R15: 00007ffc8af44008